Wikinuujs:De Kaffee
Veurblaad - Lètste verangeringe, Willekäörige pazjena, Veur pagina's in, Alle artikele - De Kaffee, Zandjbak, Hölp, Spellingshölp - Nuujseuverzich
Zuuch de euverlègksziej ven g'm veurblaaje en 't arsjief veur aajer euverlègkinger.
Wèlkóm bie de Kaffee. Dit is de plaats wodet geer mit anger gebroekers van 't perjek kint kalle.
- en: Requests for the bot flag should be made on this page. This wiki uses the standard bot policy, and allows global bots and automatic approval of certain types of bots. Other bots should apply below, and then request access from a steward if there is no objection.
Afbeelding van de week[brón bewèrke]
Er mag best wel wat kleur worden gebracht aan deze pagina. Mijn suggestie aan jullie is het toevoegen van een wekelijkse afbeelding die uitbeeldt wat precies speelt in dat tijdsbestek.
Om te beginnen stel ik voor een plaatje van Avicii die de gemoederen bezighoudt over de hele wereld.
Als voorproefje: 28 jaor awwe Zjwaedse elektro-dancemeziekant Avicii sjterf in Oman
Het lukt mij alleen niet om de bronnenlijst open te krijgen. Kan iemand hiernaar kijken? Alcomilk
- Alderieës, wilkóm! Doe maags hie gerös op 't plat sjrieve!
- Danke veur dien artikel; ich höb 't drek efkes naogelaeze en her en der get ane spèlling verangerdj. De brónnelies wirk hie neet ómdet v'r hie neet mit e brónsjebloean wirke. Ich höb 't verangerdj zodet 't noe waal wirk.
- Det plaetje maags se waat mich betröf gewuuen toeveuge aan 't veurblaad. --OWTB (talk) 09:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Ik hou het voorlopig op het Nederlands. Dat gaat mij namelijk een stuk beter af dan al die accentjes typen, Mijn dank is groot voor de verbeteringen. Ik zal deze voor de toekomst in mijn achterhoofd houden, zodat ik mijn Limburgse spelling naar behoren kan brengen. Alcomilk
- Gei perbleem. Al zègke ze waal: Übing macht den Meister! :) --OWTB (talk) 08:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Laten we deze week een afbeelding pakken van Korea om de toenadering tussen deze twee landen te symboliseren op de voorpagina. Alcomilk
- Dooch meh! Troewes, wen se get plaats op 'n euverlègkpagina (wie hie), den kans se gerös óngerteikene mit drie tildes: ~~~~. Den kriegs se juus wie mich zon sjoean handjteikening mit datum en tied: --OWTB (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Ook namens mij een hartelijk welkom! :-) Benopat (talk) 11:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Dank u wel! Ik het een nieuwe afbeelding toegevoegd. Alcomilk (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Wuuert 't noe neet tied veur e nuuj plaetje? Benopat (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Ik zal de afbeelding van de Palestijnse protesten toevoegen. Deze zullen nog zeker een week relevant blijven. Alcomilk (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Danke! Zoea te zeen mótte v'r waal nag 't sjebluuenke inveure. Dao kiek ich dizmiddig 'ns haer. --OWTB (talk) 09:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Maondjkattegorieje[brón bewèrke]
Ich zeen det de nuje gebroeker haet beslaote te kattegorisere op maondj. Ich vinj det eigelik nag lang neet zo'n slech idee en stèl veur det veer det ouch gaon toepasse bie al de nuuj pazjena's die de anger gebroekers - wo ouch michzelf ónger vilt - dit gaon doorveure in häör nuuj artikels. Zelf vinj ich dit namelik hieël euverzichtelik en boews se zo eigelik 'n saort van kollaasjgezèt op van edere maondj waat se zo kins bekieke in de kattegorie. Benopat (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ich vinj 't zelf neet nuuedig. V'r höbbe de artikelsjebloeanen op 't veurblaad; det kump feitelik op 'tzelvendje neer en steit onna chronologisch... --OWTB (talk) 08:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- De kattegorisering haet es veurdeil det de pagina's chronologisch zeen te vinje via de kattegorieboum zónger det se de sjabloonpagina's aaf hoofs te loupe. Belangriek is sowieso det veer kómme toet 'n eindujig systeem en neet det v'r - wie in 't verli-jje - belanje in 'n situatie mit 'ne misjmasj van systeme die allemaol naevenein loupe. Die staasje zeen veer noe toch houpelik waal gepasseerd dach ich zo... Benopat (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Ik heb de vrijheid genomen de maandcategorie voor de maand mei in te voeren bij alle geschikte artikels. Alcomilk (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Datumpagina's[brón bewèrke]
't Stik hie van de laeg datumpagina's, zowie 11 aug 2007. Pagina's wie dees bringe de algehieële kwaliteit ómlieëg en zeen slech veur ós imago. Ich stèl veur det veer dees doon verplaatse nao de Wikinuujs-naamruumde. Den tèlle ze ouch neet mieër mit in 't aantal artikele det veer höbbe. Ich bön bereid de taak van 't verplaatse op mich te numme. Benopat (talk) 15:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Jao, det is good. Mesjiens kónne v'r den baeter ouch 't {{Aad}}-sjebloean baeter eweghaole. Det liek mich onneet ech nöttig. --OWTB (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Det is gein slech idee. Zelf dink ich det 't slummer is óm ouch nog 'ne daagcategorie aan te make wo veer dan die artikele in kinne plaatse. Det hiltj alles biejein en tegeliek euverzichtelik. Benopat (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Det geit inderdaad ouch. --OWTB (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Det is gein slech idee. Zelf dink ich det 't slummer is óm ouch nog 'ne daagcategorie aan te make wo veer dan die artikele in kinne plaatse. Det hiltj alles biejein en tegeliek euverzichtelik. Benopat (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Guoan dag! Ech han vörsuch mal die notifikation doabova uut te sette aber dää düot nix wää wêt wie ech dät kläärkòm doamit?!
Ech hammal jeklickt dropp aber dää liët aläin dät ruad ewächmaoke dät mutt auch dät äins ewächsin
Ech han auch jät expirimentirre oppn sandback. ech han doa wät däil auch vutjemack! ech jon mi jät äet en dann schauch mal zröck vör te kieke of hey jät uut es wa tschüss !
- Haj! :) Experimenteer meh gerös get inne zandjbak, det maak nieks.
- Kans se get specifieker zeen waat se mèns mit "notifikation"? --OWTB (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Dät häät die notifikation boave in do rey mit däm bäckski wo dät in stiët schreava. nächsch an don bell. jetz stiët doa n äins van ênn beschäid, nächsch an euverlêgk aber ech bön janz bley dät ma hey auch so rasch reagiert äss ech wät vutmak kannso mal sägi en ech bring dät zröck wie es jehüort!
- Is det neet gewuuen 'n kwestie van op 't bölke bieje notifikaasje te klikke? --OWTB (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Joa dät stümmt. Nuu ech oppn knauf han jedrück es dät auch janz ewäch. Wie kann ech auch information tufüoge? Ech hammal jekiake aber ech verstoa nit janz wät ech sall duo Hülp es ümmer wilkòm !
- Det is good! :) Hieël sumpel. Op 't veurblaad steit e veldj veur nuuj artikele te make. De res wies zich eigentlik van zich :) --OWTB (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Recent changes[brón bewèrke]
De recent changes hebben de afgelopen tijd te maken met een malfunctie, maar ik weet niet precies waar deze vandaan moet komen. Wel kan ik vertellen dat ik erachter ben gekomen hoe ik dit kan oplossen.
Met de link: [1] kom je namelijk terug op de recent changes zoals die was voordat het brak. Alcomilk (talk) 18:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Na het openen van de link moet je trouwens wel nog even verversen door op "Show" te klikken. Alcomilk (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dat ervaar ik dan toch echt wel anders. Namelijk, door het feit dat ik geen enkel probleem ondervindt bij de recente veranderingen. Toegeven moet ik wel dat ik altijd de mobiele telefoon gebruik en nooit op de computer zit. Zou het hieraan kunnen liggen?
- Verder is het misschien een idee om terug te gaan naar de oude versie van deze speciale pagina. Deze vereist geen JavaScript en is een stuk eenvoudiger in elkaar gezet. Ikzelf gebruik nog steeds de oude versie. Je kunt de instellingen aanpassen onder het desbetreffende tabblad in jouw voorkeuren, in de balk rechstboven. Benopat (talk) 18:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt voor de tips! Ik gebruik inderdaad een desktop, dus het kan heel goed dat het hieraan ligt. Ik ben zelf toch verknot aan de versie zoals ik die ken. Ik ben geen oude rot in het vak, dus voor mij is oud juist nieuw, want de oude versies ben ik niet mee opgegroeid, en dus ook niet bekend mee. De oplossing die ik heb gevonden werkt prima, dus ik hou het daarbij. Ik wilde het gewoon even kenbaar maken aan jullie! Alcomilk (talk) 18:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich weit 't onneet, went ich gebroek 'ne computer mitte aaj recènte verangeringen en Monobook. Ich ervaar gein perbleme es get esthetische zake :) --OWTB (talk) 14:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich bön juus veur de lol effe euvergesjakeld nao de nuuj versie van RC. Oet ieërlikheidswaege mót ich toch waal zègke det ich 'tzelfde probleem ervaar op de vaste computer, mer neet op de smartphone. Is dit neet get det veer mótte doorsluze nao de developers? Ich kin mich veurstèlle det 's mieë luuj zeen waat dit probleem mitmake. Benopat (talk) 15:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Als meerdere gebruikers hier toch blijkbaar last van hebben, zou ik zeker een melding maken van dit voorval. Ik vermoed dat we hier namelijk te maken hebben met een bug in de software. Dat lijkt me toch wel vermeldingswaardig bij de betreffende instantie. Alcomilk (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Ik zie net dat het probleem inmiddels al is verholpen! Er is dus niks meer aan de hand. Alcomilk (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Bronnen bij werk van eigen redactie[brón bewèrke]
We geven op dit moment de bronnen aan onder een subtekst "Brónne". Eerst was dit nog niet het geval, maar het lijkt nu enigszins te hebben aangeslagen. Ik vind dit systeem goed werken, maar weet niet wat er moet gebeuren bij artikelen die volledig door de eigen redactie zijn geschreven, als voorbeeld wil ik hier graag Aovendjhits in Midde-Limbörg erbij pakken.
Heeft dit verder implicaties met verplicht bronvermelden? In andere woorden, moeten wij per se bronnen toevoegen of hoeft dat niet? Is dan een disclaimer nodig dat we het zelf 'uit de duim hebben gezogen'?
De andere vraag die mij nog resteert is, of het überhaupt kan dat wij eigen verhalen vanuit de redactie schrijven. Valt dat namelijk niet onder original research? Alcomilk (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Voor zover ik weet hebben wij hier nooit afspraken over gemaakt. Ik geloof dat we in zo'n geval geen bronnen aangeven. Persoonlijk lijkt het mij inderdaad duidelijk om te kiezen voor de variant waarbij pagina's die zijn geschreven door de eigen redactie, worden voorzien van een bronnenkopje waaronder wordt vermeld dat het werk afkomstig is van de eigen redactie.
- Dat geeft dan ook deels antwoord op je tweede vraag: Bronnen vermelden is een verplichting. Voor de duidelijkheid is mijn oplossing zoals hierboven dan ook een goede oplossing.
- M.b.t. original research: Ik geloof dat we hier op een vaag gebied zitten. De algemene tendens is dat dit voor kleinere talen en projecten zoals Wikinews over het algemeen wordt gedoogd. Benopat (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Nou, dan stel ik voor dat we vanaf nu gewoon bij ieder artikel dat wordt geschreven door de eigen redactie gaan vermelden dat het is geschreven door de eigen redactie. Mocht ik nog artikels tegenkomen die hieraan voldoen, denk ik dat ik deze ook ga aanpassen om dit te reflecteren. Handig lijkt mij wel om hier duidelijke afspraken over te maken, zodat we precies weten hoe we dit opschrijven. Onder het kopje met "Brónne" lijkt mij inderdaad zeer gepast en ook een elegante oplossing. Alcomilk (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Deze situatie zal zich wel niet heel vaak voordoen, dus misschien is een sjabloon met een toegevoegde categorie geen overbodige luxe. In het verleden zijn zo'n dingen wel vaker misgegaan, waardoor het een rommeltje is geworden. Een groot deel van deze testwiki bestaat namelijk uit een potpourri van datumartikels die weinig tot nul komma nul inhoud hebben. Gelukkig zitten we nu eindelijk op het goeie pad! Benopat (talk) 19:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Ich vinj 't allemaol good :) --OWTB (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Ik heb geprobeerd er iets van te maken. Kijk maar of jullie het goed vinden zo! Alcomilk (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ik dacht dat het aanvankelijk jouw plan was om hier een sjabloon van te maken? Voor de consistentie zou dat natuurlijk beter zijn, want we schrijven immers niet allemaal in hetzelfde dialect, en het kan lastig zijn om zo'n soortgelijke artikelen - als in: artikelen van de eigen redactie - terug te vinden. Zou het dan niet beter zijn een sjabloon te maken?
- Een nadelig punt van een sjabloon met vast stramien is wel weer dat je dan de artikels niet langer in één dialect kunt houden.
- Zullen we het dan maar voorlopig gewoon zo houden? Een categorie eraan plakken en we zijn klaar, dacht ik zo. :-) Benopat (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Ich höb veur noe de categorie "Eige redactie" aangemaak, zoeadet geer in 't vervolg al eur eige werke in dees categorie kóntj plaatse. Benopat (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hieël good! :) Wen ich nag zon pagina's taengekóm zal ich die d'rin duje. --OWTB (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Categorisering[brón bewèrke]
Hoj. Ich mót toch waal 'ns get van 't bors aafdrökke. Ich vinj namelik de hujige categorisering 'ne puinhoup en stèl dan ouch veur hie get aanpassinge aan te doon. Mich geit 't mit name euver de óneuverzichtelikheid en óndudelikheid van de structuurcategorieë (daomit wil ich dus zègke: de categorieë wo alles van de Wikinuujs insteit, van hölppagina's toet aan sjablone, en van waerberichte toet aan archieve). Ich dink det hie namelik nog väöl ruumte viltj te behaole, womit veer de wiki get presentabeler kónne make en tegeliekertied ouch baeter te navigere make. Ich haop dan ouch det ich van uch de zaenge krieg óm hieaan te beginne. Es ich nog get wiejer in detail mót traeje euver waat ich precies van plan bön óm te doon, dan moog geer mich gerös get vraoge stèlle! Benopat (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ich verstaon neet próntj waat eigentlik zónne puinhoup mót zeen... V'r höbbe recèntelik toch al bès 't eint en t angert versjaove. Mer eder verbaetering is wilkóm. --OWTB (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ich höb michzelf veurgestèldj get wiejer d'n deepgank d'rin te bringe. Väöl categorieë zitte noe te vol, mit te väöl pagina's, wodoor dees neet langer euverzichtelik zeen. Door extra categorieë aan te ligke en de categoriestructuur in zien totaliteit aan te pakke, haop ich det dit probleem wuuert opgelos, zodet alles gemekkeliker is te vinje, en per categorie minder subcategorieë en subpagina's zeen. Benopat (talk) 13:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Is er verder al iets meer bekend over dit project? Ik heb zelf namelijk ook her en der wat gesleuteld en hoop dat ik daarmee jouw niet het gras voor de voeten wegmaai. Alcomilk (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Aangenómme[brón bewèrke]
Leef luuj,
LangCom haet oos projèk aangenómme. Det hèltj in det ozen eige wiki wuuertj aangemaak :) Veur noe kóntj g'r gewuuen hie blieve bewirke toetdet de nuje wiki aan is gemaak gewaore. Meistes geit dao nannen tied euverhaer. --OWTB (talk) 14:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Dat is goed nieuws! Hou ons op de hoogte en laat zeker weten wat de vervolgstappen zijn. Alcomilk (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Fuitje bie verplaatsing[brón bewèrke]
Ooswesthoesbes, ich höb bie 't verplaatse van de datumpagina's nao de Wikinuujs-naamruumte 'n groeate fout begange. Ich höb inkele van die pagina's namelik versjaove nao 'ne naam mit drek achter d'n dóbbele puntj 'n spatie. E veurbeeld hievan is Wikinuujs: 2 eprèl 2007. Det zów netuurlik "Wikinuujs:2 eprèl 2007" mótte zeen. Is 't veur dich meugelik det probleem op te losse? Ich kan mer twieë pagina's per minuut verplaatse, waat dit dus tiedrouvend werk maak. Ich wil 't namelik aaf höbbe veurdet de nuje wiki wuuert opgerich. Benopat (talk) 13:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Zijkant onder het logo[brón bewèrke]
In de doorstuurbalk links, direct onder het logo, staat in mijn optiek een nutteloze dode link. Het betreft de link onder de naam "Gebroekersportaol". In alle wezenlijkheid is dit een inhoudsloze pagina. Mij lijkt het beter deze link daarom door te sturen naar deze pagina ("Wikinuujs:De Kaffee") en tevens de betreffende naam van de link te vervangen met de naam van deze pagina. De andere pagina waarnaar het Gebroekersportaol verwijst kan reeds direct via hetzelde menu worden bereikt onder het knopje "Hölp". Alcomilk (euverlègk) 31 dec 2018 18:21 (CET)
- Ich verstaon eigentlik neet tegooj euver welche balk des se kals... --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 1 jan 2019 11:09 (CET)
- Ich dink det d'r 't euver de sidebar haet. Benopat (euverlègk) 7 jan 2019 12:18 (CET)
- Och, dat bedoel je. Zie (en wijzig) hier: MediaWiki:Sidebar. Je kunt afkijken op nl:MediaWiki:Sidebar Ymnes (euverlègk) 7 jan 2019 13:12 (CET)
- Ich dink det d'r 't euver de sidebar haet. Benopat (euverlègk) 7 jan 2019 12:18 (CET)
Inderdaad. Die zijbalk bedoel ik! Alcomilk (euverlègk) 7 jan 2019 19:01 (CET)
Ich höb 'm aangepas. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 8 jan 2019 13:48 (CET)
Zalig nuujjaor[brón bewèrke]
Leef luuj, ich wins uch e zalig en vröchbaar nuujjaor. Det v'r weer väöl sjoean artikelkes kómme te sjrieve :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 1 jan 2019 11:28 (CET)
w:Sjabloon:Wikinuujs op WP?[brón bewèrke]
't Gaef nao 't sjient op de Limburgse WP nog gei sjabloon om vanaaf 'n paasj dao nao hie te linke. (w:Sjabloon:Wikibeuk besjteit al waal). Aonmake mer? De Wikischim (euverlègk) 28 jan 2019 13:45 (CET)
- Doe höbs mien zaenge :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 29 jan 2019 10:38 (CET)
Fotoreportages[brón bewèrke]
@ Ooswesthoesbes, Benopat, Alcomilk, Steinbach: ik wil jullie graag eens op de fotoreportages wijzen die een eigen categorie vormen op de Nederlandstalige Wikinieuws. Als jullie daar een van maken in het Limburgs, dan zal ik die graag naar het Nederlands vertalen. Dat doe ik nu ook al geregeld met fotoreportages in het Engels en Russisch.
Gisteren heb ik de carnavalsoptocht in Oldenzaal (Boeskoolstad) gefotografeerd en dit artikel over gemaakt: Eerste prijs voor de Blaanke Boeskeulkes tijdens de Grote Optocht van Twente. Hier staan er nog meer: Categorie:Originele fotoreportage.
Zoals jullie zien is daar niet veel tekst bij nodig. Zelfs bronvermelding is niet nodig: het mag zelfgeschreven tekst zijn. En... carnaval hebben jullie ook :-) Maar er zijn nog zoveel anderen dingen waarover ook een aantal foto's te maken zijn.
Hopelijk heb ik jullie met dit berichtje aangemoedigd om daar ook af en toe eentje van te maken! Ik zou er tenminste graag af en toe eentje van zien.
Ymnes (euverlègk) 4 mie 2019 20:00 (CET)
- 't Idee is waal gans sjoon en sympathiek Ymnes. Väöl anger basale zake op dees klein wiki dae nog mer zopas is begoosj höbbe aevel veurluipig get meë prioriteit neudig, geluif ich tenminste. Zoo motte bieveurbeeld bienao alle cats hie nog baeter gewikificeerd waere (zeen ouch hie). Daonave vraog ich mich ouch aaf: sjrief Alcomilk eigelik ouch in 't Limburgs? De Wikischim (euverlègk) 5 mie 2019 22:24 (CET)
- Belangrijke dingen, en Alcomilk schrijft ook nieuwe artikelen in het Limburgs. Van alle belangrijke dingen staan de nieuwe artikelen denk ik op 1, en is de rest ook belangrijk. Ymnes (euverlègk) 5 mie 2019 22:29 (CET)
- 't Is op zich waal e sjoean idee veur get mieër eige werk te kónne levere. Aevel bön ich 't èns mitte Wikischim det v'r op 't memènt anger prioriteiten höbbe. 't Is waal get waat ich mich innen achterkop haaj :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 7 mie 2019 10:41 (CET)
- Belangrijke dingen, en Alcomilk schrijft ook nieuwe artikelen in het Limburgs. Van alle belangrijke dingen staan de nieuwe artikelen denk ik op 1, en is de rest ook belangrijk. Ymnes (euverlègk) 5 mie 2019 22:29 (CET)
Ook ik pas hier eventjes. Na alle carnavalsdrukte zal ik eerst weer hier de draad op moeten pakken. Er is nog veel achterstallig onderhoud. :) Alcomilk (euverlègk) 7 mie 2019 20:17 (CET)
Veur es de nog 'ns 'n artikel wils vertale ...[brón bewèrke]
Zeen Wikidata: d:Q62278255. De kins oet 't Duutsj vertale of oet 't Hollands. De Wikischim (euverlègk) 23 mie 2019 16:16 (CET)
- Ha kies. Det is sjoean! :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 23 mie 2019 16:28 (CET)
- 't Gaef nog meë nuujs oet Mestreech: e stök van de sjtadsmuur haet 't begaeve. De Wikischim (euverlègk) 24 mie 2019 11:42 (CET)
- Jao ich haw 't al gelaeze. Spietelik höb ich geinen tied veur ederen daag e nuuj artikel te sjrieve. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 25 mie 2019 16:23 (CET)
- d:Q62395987? De Wikischim (euverlègk) 25 mie 2019 23:52 (CET)
- Ich gaon 'ns ane slaag :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 26 mie 2019 10:40 (CET)
- d:Q62395987? De Wikischim (euverlègk) 25 mie 2019 23:52 (CET)
- Jao ich haw 't al gelaeze. Spietelik höb ich geinen tied veur ederen daag e nuuj artikel te sjrieve. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 25 mie 2019 16:23 (CET)
Bot policy[brón bewèrke]
Hello. To facilitate steward granting of bot access, I suggest implementing the standard bot policy on this wiki. In particular, this policy allows stewards to automatically flag known interlanguage linking bots (if this page says that is acceptable), which form the vast majority of such requests. The policy also enables global bots on this wiki (if this page says that is acceptable), which are trusted bots that will be given bot access on every wiki that allows global bots.
This policy makes bot access requesting much easier for local users, operators, and stewards. To implement it we only need to create a redirect to this page from Project:Bot policy, and add a line at the top noting that it is used here. Please read the text at m:Bot policy before commenting. If you object, please say so; I hope to implement in two weeks if there is no objection, since it is particularly written to streamline bot requests on wikis with little or no community interested in bot access requests. Rschen7754 13 apr 2019 23:55 (CEST)
- As the community is small, I agree with the implementation. --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 14 apr 2019 16:28 (CEST)
HD logo of your project[brón bewèrke]
Sorry for writing in English. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Hello,
your project previously had a HD logo set (a logo that's used on displays supporting higher density, used to prefer logo to display blurred). The HD logo was set to https://people.wikimedia.org/~urbanecm/T227418/liwikinews-1.5x.png. However, your project currently uses a different logo. Because of this difference, I've temporarily removed HD logo from your wiki, and would like to ask you, which logo you would prefer. Please let me know on the Phabricator task, or, if none of your community members knows how to comment on Phabricator, on my meta user talk page.
Best regards, --Martin Urbanec (euverlègk) 8 jul 2019 14:45 (CEST)
- Ich höb 'm laote weite det v'r gaere de versie willen höbbe wo "Wikinuujs" op steit. Veure res kan ich nieks dao-euver zègke went ich weit gaar neet waat 'n HD-logo is :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 8 jul 2019 15:47 (CEST)
- Ze höbben 't logo noe verzatj :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 11 jul 2019 16:50 (CEST)
New tools and IP masking[brón bewèrke]
Hey everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation wants to work on two things that affect how we patrol changes and handle vandalism and harassment. We want to make the tools that are used to handle bad edits better. We also want to get better privacy for unregistered users so their IP addresses are no longer shown to everyone in the world. We would not hide IP addresses until we have better tools for patrolling.
We have an idea of what tools could be working better and how a more limited access to IP addresses would change things, but we need to hear from more wikis. You can read more about the project on Meta and post comments and feedback. Now is when we need to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment.
You can post in your language if you can't write in English.
Johan (WMF)21 aug 2019 16:18 (CEST)
The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started[brón bewèrke]
Hello,
In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".
Accordingly, the Foundation's Trust & Safety team invites all Wikimedians to join this consultation and give their feedback from 30 September to 30 October.
How can you help?
- Suggest how partial and temporary Foundation bans should be used, if they should (eg: On all projects, or only on a subset);
- Give ideas about how partial and temporary Foundation bans should ideally implemented, if they should be; and/or
- Propose changes to the existing Office Actions policy on partial and temporary bans.
We offer our thanks in advance for your contributions, and we hope to get as much input as possible from community members during this consultation!
-- Kbrown (WMF) 30 sep 2019 19:13 (CEST)
Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project[brón bewèrke]
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Haj. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.
We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.
We would like individual feedback on the following:
- Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
- Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
- Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far
We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.
When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:
- Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
- Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
- Put things in logical and useful places
- Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
- Eliminate clutter
- Plan for future growth
As well as the following constraints:
- Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
- Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
- No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors
Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements
After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.
Danke! Quiddity (WMF) (talk)
16 okt 2019 09:14 (CEST)
Community Wishlist 2020[brón bewèrke]
The 2020 Community Wishlist Survey is now open! This survey is the process where communities decide what the Community Tech team should work on over the next year. We encourage everyone to submit proposals until the deadline on November 11, 2019, or comment on other proposals to help make them better.
This year, we’re exclusively focusing on smaller projects (i.e., Wikibooks, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikiversity, Wikispecies, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews). We want to help these projects and provide meaningful improvements to diverse communities. If you’re a member of any of these projects, please participate in the survey! To submit proposals, see the guidelines on the survey page. You can write proposals in any language, and we will translate them for you. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing your proposals!
IFried (WMF) 4 nov 2019 20:30 (CET)
Aad en heit nuuts[brón bewèrke]
Ich haw bliekbaar örges 't sjebluuenke vergaeten en det haw zich e paar maondj doorgetróch... Ich höb 't noe weer euveral aan toegeveug en ouch de aaj sjebluuenkes van heit nao (k)aad gezatj :) --Ooswesthoesbes (euverlègk) 24 dec 2019 10:00 (CET)
Wiki Loves Folklore[brón bewèrke]
.svg){kind=logo}
Hello Folks,
Wiki Loves Love is back again in 2020 iteration as Wiki Loves Folklore from 1 February, 2020 - 29 February, 2020. Join us to celebrate the local cultural heritage of your region with the theme of folklore in the international photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. Images, videos and audios representing different forms of folk cultures and new forms of heritage that haven’t otherwise been documented so far are welcome submissions in Wiki Loves Folklore. Learn more about the contest at Meta-Wiki and Commons.
Kind regards,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk)
sent using MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 18 jan 2020 07:14 (CET)
Movement Learning and Leadership Development Project[brón bewèrke]
Hello
The Wikimedia Foundation’s Community Development team is seeking to learn more about the way volunteers learn and develop into the many different roles that exist in the movement. Our goal is to build a movement informed framework that provides shared clarity and outlines accessible pathways on how to grow and develop skills within the movement. To this end, we are looking to speak with you, our community to learn about your journey as a Wikimedia volunteer. Whether you joined yesterday or have been here from the very start, we want to hear about the many ways volunteers join and contribute to our movement.
To learn more about the project, please visit the Meta page. If you are interested in participating in the project, please complete this simple Google form. Although we may not be able to speak to everyone who expresses interest, we encourage you to complete this short form if you are interested in participating!
-- LMiranda (WMF) (talk) 22 jan 2020 20:01 (CET)
Feedback on movement names[brón bewèrke]
Haj. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok if necessary. Danke!
There are a lot of conversations happening about the future of our movement names. We hope that you are part of these discussions and that your community is represented.
Since 16 June, the Foundation Brand Team has been running a survey in 7 languages about 3 naming options. There are also community members sharing concerns about renaming in a Community Open Letter.
Our goal in this call for feedback is to hear from across the community, so we encourage you to participate in the survey, the open letter, or both. The survey will go through 7 July in all timezones. Input from the survey and discussions will be analyzed and published on Meta-Wiki.
Thanks for thinking about the future of the movement, --The Brand Project team, 2 jul 2020 21:52 (CEST)
Note: The survey is conducted via a third-party service, which may subject it to additional terms. For more information on privacy and data-handling, see the survey privacy statement.
Announcing a new wiki project! Welcome, Abstract Wikipedia[brón bewèrke]
Hi all,
It is my honor to introduce Abstract Wikipedia, a new project that has been unanimously approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. Abstract Wikipedia proposes a new way to generate baseline encyclopedic content in a multilingual fashion, allowing more contributors and more readers to share more knowledge in more languages. It is an approach that aims to make cross-lingual cooperation easier on our projects, increase the sustainability of our movement through expanding access to participation, improve the user experience for readers of all languages, and innovate in free knowledge by connecting some of the strengths of our movement to create something new.
This is our first new project in over seven years. Abstract Wikipedia was submitted as a project proposal by Denny Vrandečić in May 2020 [1] after years of preparation and research, leading to a detailed plan and lively discussions in the Wikimedia communities. We know that the energy and the creativity of the community often runs up against language barriers, and information that is available in one language may not make it to other language Wikipedias. Abstract Wikipedia intends to look and feel like a Wikipedia, but build on the powerful, language-independent conceptual models of Wikidata, with the goal of letting volunteers create and maintain Wikipedia articles across our polyglot Wikimedia world.
The project will allow volunteers to assemble the fundamentals of an article using words and entities from Wikidata. Because Wikidata uses conceptual models that are meant to be universal across languages, it should be possible to use and extend these building blocks of knowledge to create models for articles that also have universal value. Using code, volunteers will be able to translate these abstract “articles” into their own languages. If successful, this could eventually allow everyone to read about any topic in Wikidata in their own language.
As you can imagine, this work will require a lot of software development, and a lot of cooperation among Wikimedians. In order to make this effort possible, Denny will join the Foundation as a staff member in July and lead this initiative. You may know Denny as the creator of Wikidata, a long-time community member, a former staff member at Wikimedia Deutschland, and a former Trustee at the Wikimedia Foundation [2]. We are very excited that Denny will bring his skills and expertise to work on this project alongside the Foundation’s product, technology, and community liaison teams.
It is important to acknowledge that this is an experimental project, and that every Wikipedia community has different needs. This project may offer some communities great advantages. Other communities may engage less. Every language Wikipedia community will be free to choose and moderate whether or how they would use content from this project.
We are excited that this new wiki-project has the possibility to advance knowledge equity through increased access to knowledge. It also invites us to consider and engage with critical questions about how and by whom knowledge is constructed. We look forward to working in cooperation with the communities to think through these important questions.
There is much to do as we begin designing a plan for Abstract Wikipedia in close collaboration with our communities. I encourage you to get involved by going to the project page and joining the new mailing list [3]. We recognize that Abstract Wikipedia is ambitious, but we also recognize its potential. We invite you all to join us on a new, unexplored path.
Yours,
Katherine Maher (Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation)
Sent by m:User:Elitre (WMF) 9 jul 2020 21:56 (CEST) - m:Special:MyLanguage/Abstract Wikipedia/July 2020 announcement
Important: maintenance operation on September 1st[brón bewèrke]
Read this message in another language • Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data centre. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic to the secondary data centre on Tuesday, September 1st 2020.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, September 1st. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 19:30 IST, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Wednesday September 2).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the week of September 1st, 2020. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community.
Trizek (WMF) (talk) 26 aug 2020 15:48 (CEST)
Invitation to participate in the conversation[brón bewèrke]
Haj. Apologies for cross-posting, and that you may not be reading this message in your native language: translations of the following announcement may be available on Meta. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. Danke!
We are excited to share a draft of the Universal Code of Conduct, which the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees called for earlier this year, for your review and feedback. The discussion will be open until October 6, 2020.
The UCoC Drafting Committee wants to learn which parts of the draft would present challenges for you or your work. What is missing from this draft? What do you like, and what could be improved?
Please join the conversation and share this invitation with others who may be interested to join, too.
To reduce language barriers during the process, you are welcomed to translate this message and the Universal Code of Conduct/Draft review. You and your community may choose to provide your opinions/feedback using your local languages.
To learn more about the UCoC project, see the Universal Code of Conduct page, and the FAQ, on Meta.
Thanks in advance for your attention and contributions, The Trust and Safety team at Wikimedia Foundation, 10 sep 2020 19:55 (CEST)Wiki of functions naming contest[brón bewèrke]
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Haj. Please help pick a name for the new Wikimedia wiki project. This project will be a wiki where the community can work together on a library of functions. The community can create new functions, read about them, discuss them, and share them. Some of these functions will be used to help create language-independent Wikipedia articles that can be displayed in any language, as part of the Abstract Wikipedia project. But functions will also be usable in many other situations.
There will be two rounds of voting, each followed by legal review of candidates, with voting beginning on 29 September and 27 October. Our goal is to have a final project name selected on 8 December. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at meta-wiki. Danke! --Quiddity (WMF)29 sep 2020 23:26 (CEST)
Wiki of functions naming contest[brón bewèrke]
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Haj. Please help pick a name for the new Wikimedia wiki project. This project will be a wiki where the community can work together on a library of functions. The community can create new functions, read about them, discuss them, and share them. Some of these functions will be used to help create language-independent Wikipedia articles that can be displayed in any language, as part of the Abstract Wikipedia project. But functions will also be usable in many other situations.
There will be two rounds of voting, each followed by legal review of candidates, with voting beginning on 29 September and 27 October. Our goal is to have a final project name selected on 8 December. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at meta-wiki. Danke! --Quiddity (WMF)30 sep 2020 00:49 (CEST)
Call for feedback about Wikimedia Foundation Bylaws changes and Board candidate rubric[brón bewèrke]
Haj. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok.
Today the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees starts two calls for feedback. One is about changes to the Bylaws mainly to increase the Board size from 10 to 16 members. The other one is about a trustee candidate rubric to introduce new, more effective ways to evaluate new Board candidates. The Board welcomes your comments through 26 October. For more details, check the full announcement.
Important: maintenance operation on October 27[brón bewèrke]
Read this message in another language • Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
The Wikimedia Foundation tests the switch between its first and secondary data centers. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic back to the primary data center on Tuesday, October 27 2020.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, October 27. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (14:00 WET, 15:00 CET, 10:00 EDT, 19:30 IST, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 03:00 NZDT on Wednesday October 28).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the week of October 26, 2020. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
-- Trizek (WMF) (talk) 21 okt 2020 19:10 (CEST)
Wiki of functions naming contest - Round 2[brón bewèrke]
Haj. Reminder: Please help to choose the name for the new Wikimedia wiki project - the library of functions. The finalist vote starts today. The finalists for the name are: Wikicode, Wikicodex, Wikifunctions, Wikifusion, Wikilambda, Wikimedia Functions. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at Meta-wiki. Danke! --Quiddity (WMF)
5 nov 2020 23:10 (CET)
2021 enquête over de verlanglijst van de gemeenschap[brón bewèrke]
De 2021 enquête over de verlanglijst van de gemeenschap is nu geopend! De enquête is de manier waarmee gemeenschappen bepalen waar het Community Tech team volgend jaar aan moet gaan werken. We moedigen iedereen aan om voorstellen in te dienen voor de deadline op 30 november, of om te reageren op andere voorstellen om ze te helpen verbeteren. De gemeenschappen stemmen op de voorstellen tussen 8 december en 21 december.
Het Community Tech team is gefocussed op hulpmiddelen voor ervaren Wikimedia bewerkers. U kunt voorstellen in elke taal opstellen en wij vertalen deze. Bedankt en we kijken uit naar uw voorstellen!
SGrabarczuk (WMF) 20 nov 2020 06:11 (CET)
Global bot policy proposal: invitation to a Meta discussion[brón bewèrke]
Haj!
I apologize for sending a message in English. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. According to the list, your wiki project currently is opted in to the global bot policy. Under this policy, bots that fix double redirects or maintain interwiki links are allowed to operate under a global bot flag that is assigned directly by the stewards.
As the Wikimedia projects developed, the need for the current global bot policy decreased, and in the past years, no bots were appointed via that policy. That is mainly given Wikidata were estabilished in 2013, and it is no longer necessary to have dozens of bots that maintain interwiki links.
A proposal was made at Meta-Wiki, which proposes that the stewards will be authorized to determine whether an uncontroversial task may be assigned a global bot flag. The stewards already assign permissions that are more impactful on many wikis, namely, global sysops and global renamers, and I do not think that trust should be an issue. The stewards will assign the permission only to time-proven bots that are already approved at a number of projects, like ListeriaBot.
By this message, I would like to invite you to comment in the global RFC, to voice your opinion about this matter.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Martin Urbanec (Euverlèk) 24 nov 2020 12:49 (CET)
Wikidata descriptions changes to be included more often in Recent Changes and Watchlist[brón bewèrke]
Sorry for sending this message in English. Translations are available on this page. Feel free to translate it in more languages!
As you may know, you can include changes coming from Wikidata in your Watchlist and Recent Changes (in your preferences). Until now, this feature didn’t always include changes made on Wikidata descriptions due to the way Wikidata tracks the data used in a given article.
Starting on December 3rd, the Watchlist and Recent Changes will include changes on the descriptions of Wikidata Items that are used in the pages that you watch. This will only include descriptions in the language of your wiki to make sure that you’re only seeing changes that are relevant to your wiki.
This improvement was requested by many users from different projects. We hope that it can help you monitor the changes on Wikidata descriptions that affect your wiki and participate in the effort of improving the data quality on Wikidata for all Wikimedia wikis and beyond.
Note: if you didn’t use the Wikidata watchlist integration feature for a long time, feel free to give it another chance! The feature has been improved since the beginning and the content it displays is more precise and useful than at the beginning of the feature in 2015.
If you encounter any issue or want to provide feedback, feel free to use this Phabricator ticket. Thanks!
Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 30 nov 2020 15:39 (CET)
2020 Coolest Tool Award Ceremony on December 11th[brón bewèrke]
Hello all,
The ceremony of the 2020 Wikimedia Coolest Tool Award will take place virtually on Friday, December 11th, at 17:00 GMT. This award is highlighting tools that have been nominated by contributors to the Wikimedia projects, and the ceremony will be a nice moment to show appreciation to the tools developers and maybe discover new tools!
You will find more information here about the livestream and the discussions channels. Thanks for your attention, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 7 dec 2020 11:55 (CET)
Onderzoek naar het Verlanglijstje van de Wikipedia-gemeenschap 2021[brón bewèrke]
We nodigen alle geregistreerde gebruikers uit om te stemmen op de 2021 Community Wishlist enquête. Je kunt vanaf nu tot aan 21 december stemmen voor zoveel verschillende wensen als u wilt.
In de enquête worden wensen voor nieuwe en verbeterde tools voor ervaren gebruikers verzameld. Na de stemming doen wij ons best om aan jouw wensen tegemoet te komen. We beginnen met de meest populaire.
Wij, het Community Tech-team, zijn een van de teams van de Wikimedia Foundation. We maken en verbeteren bewerkings- en moderatie-instrumenten voor wiki's. Waar we aan werken wordt besloten op basis van de resultaten van de Community Wishlist Enquête. Eenmaal per jaar kun je wensen indienen. Na twee weken kun je stemmen op de wensen die je het meest interesseren. Vervolgens kiezen we wensen uit de enquête om aan te werken. Een deel van de wensen kan worden ingewilligd door vrijwillige ontwikkelaars of andere teams.
We wachten in spanning op je stem. Dank je!
11 dec 2020 16:05 (CET)
Moving Wikimania 2021 to a Virtual Event[brón bewèrke]
Haj. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. Danke!
Wikimania will be a virtual event this year, and hosted by a wide group of community members. Whenever the next in-person large gathering is possible again, the ESEAP Core Organizing Team will be in charge of it. Stay tuned for more information about how you can get involved in the planning process and other aspects of the event. Please read the longer version of this announcement on wikimedia-l.
ESEAP Core Organizing Team, Wikimania Steering Committee, Wikimedia Foundation Events Team, 27 jan 2021 16:15 (CET)
Project Grant Open Call[brón bewèrke]
This is the announcement for the Project Grants program open call that started on January 11, with the submission deadline of February 10, 2021.
This first open call will be focussed on Community Organizing proposals. A second open call focused on research and software proposals is scheduled from February 15 with a submission deadline of March 16, 2021.
For the Round 1 open call, we invite you to propose grant applications that fall under community development and organizing (offline and online) categories. Project Grant funds are available to support individuals, groups, and organizations to implement new experiments and proven ideas, from organizing a better process on your wiki, coordinating a campaign or editathon series to providing other support for community building. We offer the following resources to help you plan your project and complete a grant proposal:
- Weekly proposals clinics via Zoom during the Open Call. Join us for #Upcoming_Proposal_Clinics|real-time discussions with Program Officers and select thematic experts and get live feedback about your Project Grants proposal. We’ll answer questions and help you make your proposal better. We also offer these support pages to help you build your proposal:
- Video tutorials for writing a strong application
- General planning page for Project Grants
- Program guidelines and criteria
Program officers are also available to offer individualized proposal support upon request. Contact us if you would like feedback or more information.
We are excited to see your grant ideas that will support our community and make an impact on the future of Wikimedia projects. Put your idea into motion, and submit your proposal by February 10, 2021!
Please feel free to get in touch with questions about getting started with your grant application, or about serving on the Project Grants Committee. Contact us at projectgrantsSjabloon:Atwikimedia.org. Please help us translate this message to your local language. MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 28 jan 2021 09:00 (CET)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is back![brón bewèrke]
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
Please support us in translating the project page and a banner message to help us spread the word in your native language.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (euverlègk) 6 fib 2021 14:25 (CET)
Proposal: Set two-letter project shortcuts as alias to project namespace globally[brón bewèrke]
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
Hello everyone,
I apologize for posting in English. I would like to inform everyone that I created a new global request for comment (GRFC) at Meta Wiki, which may affect your project: m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.
In this GRFC, I propose that two-project shortcuts for project names will become a default alias for the project namespace. For instance, on all Wikipedias, WP will be an alias to the Wikipedia: namespace (and similar for other projects). Full list is available in the GRFC.
This is already the case for Wikivoyages, and many individual projects asked for this alias to be implemented. I believe this makes it easier to access the materials in the project namespace, as well as creating shortcuts like WP:NPOV, as well as helps new projects to use this feature, without having to figure out how to request site configuration changes first.
As far as I can see, Wikinuujs currently does not have such an alias set. This means that such an alias will be set for you, if the GRFC is accepted by the global community.
I would like to ask all community members to participate in the request for comment at Meta-Wiki, see m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.
Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this proposal.
Best regards,
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 18 fib 2021 15:12 (CET)
Wikifunctions logo contest[brón bewèrke]
2 mie 2021 02:46 (CET)
Universal Code of Conduct – 2021 consultations[brón bewèrke]
Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2[brón bewèrke]
Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok
The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) provides a universal baseline of acceptable behavior for the entire Wikimedia movement and all its projects. The project is currently in Phase 2, outlining clear enforcement pathways. You can read more about the whole project on its project page.
Drafting Committee: Call for applications[brón bewèrke]
The Wikimedia Foundation is recruiting volunteers to join a committee to draft how to make the code enforceable. Volunteers on the committee will commit between 2 and 6 hours per week from late April through July and again in October and November. It is important that the committee be diverse and inclusive, and have a range of experiences, including both experienced users and newcomers, and those who have received or responded to, as well as those who have been falsely accused of harassment.
To apply and learn more about the process, see Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee.
2021 community consultations: Notice and call for volunteers / translators[brón bewèrke]
From 5 April – 5 May 2021 there will be conversations on many Wikimedia projects about how to enforce the UCoC. We are looking for volunteers to translate key material, as well as to help host consultations on their own languages or projects using suggested key questions. If you are interested in volunteering for either of these roles, please contact us in whatever language you are most comfortable.
To learn more about this work and other conversations taking place, see Universal Code of Conduct/2021 consultations.
-- Xeno (WMF) (talk) 5 apr 2021 23:53 (CEST)
Global bot policy changes[brón bewèrke]
Haj!
I apologize for sending a message in English. Help mit 't euverzètte nao dien spraok. According to the list, your wiki project is currently opted in to the global bot policy. As such, I want to let you know about some changes that were made after the global RfC was closed.
- Global bots are now subject to a 2 week discussion, and it'll be publicized via a MassMessage list, available at Bot policy/New global bot discussion on Meta. Please subscribe yourself or your wiki if you are interested in new global bots proposals.
- For a bot to be considered for approval, it must demonstrate it is welcomed in multiple projects, and a good way to do that is to have the bot flag on at least 5 wikis for a single task.
- The bot operator should make sure to adhere to the wiki's preference as related to the use of the bot flag (i.e., if a wiki doesn't want a bot to use the flag as it edits, that should be followed).
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
—Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 6 apr 2021 20:48 (CEST)